Skip to main content
Cheers

Research

What Sources Does ChatGPT Use to Give Recommendations?

What visible citations, local tests, and official product guidance can and cannot tell businesses about sources used in ChatGPT recommendations.

Dylan Allen-Arnegard, CEO and Co-Founder of Cheers
Dylan Allen-Arnegård

CEO & Co-Founder, Cheers

6 min readPublished Updated

Last verified .

Across the 28 days ending September 2, 2026, the Cheers market baseline collected 70,723 ChatGPT citations from home-services prompts run in 100 metro areas. 48.8% of them pointed at a contractor's own website. 44.7% pointed at a directory or review platform such as Angi, BBB, Yelp, or Expertise. Social and forum sources took 4.3%, media and vendor pages 2.0%, and google.com 0.2%.

So the practical answer is two sources, roughly split: your website and the directories that describe you. Everything else is rounding.

Last verified: September 2, 2026.

OpenAI does not publish a retrieval map, and its help article on searching the web is explicit that nothing is owed to any site:

ChatGPT ranks search results using multiple factors intended to help users find relevant, reliable information. Placement is not guaranteed.

The full panel cuts, including the same split for Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, are in AI visibility statistics, with the sampling rules in the methodology. To see which sources come back for your own brand and markets, run the Cheers AI Visibility Grader.

The short answer

Visible citations and published studies show local-business answers drawing from review platforms, directories, websites, and news articles. The internal source mix varies by product, mode, prompt, and date, and no public source provides a complete ranking or retrieval map.

For the broader strategic frame, read What is Generative Engine Optimization?. For Google's own AI Search advice, read How Local Businesses Can Show Up in Google AI Search.

If ChatGPT is already showing the wrong hours, phone, service, or branch, use the business-information correction workflow to trace the visible source and verify the fix by market.

The longer answer

Modern AI assistants can combine model knowledge with web search or retrieval features. The balance is product- and query-specific.

Model knowledge can contain information learned before the current query, but vendors do not publish a complete business-by-business inventory of that knowledge.

Search and retrieval features can fetch current web information when the product and query use them. A local prompt does not guarantee that every available source will be searched or cited.

Machine-readable business information includes structured data on business websites and platform-managed business records. Public documentation does not establish one universal weighting for those inputs.

Retrieval versus control

You cannot pick the source

Not yours to set

The engine's inputs

  • Model knowledge
  • Search and retrieval features
  • Machine-readable business information
  • No published retrieval map

Yours to maintain

The sources you own

  • Google Business Profile
  • Review platforms
  • Your website
  • Directory listings
Record the pages visibly cited for the exact prompt you tested. Use those pages as an audit trail, not as a permanent map of the engine's ranking system.

Mechanisms and source types quoted from this article, which cites Search Engine Land on ChatGPT local search, LocalFalcon on ChatGPT local data sources, and Google's AI Search guidance.

OpenAI's help article, updated in late August 2026, describes the retrieval step in plain terms. ChatGPT rewrites your question into one or more targeted queries, sends those to search providers, and shares an approximate location taken from your IP address so that a "near me" question becomes a city-scoped query. OpenAI gives site owners exactly one concrete eligibility instruction: allow OAI-SearchBot to crawl the site, and make sure the host or CDN is not blocking OpenAI's published searchbot IP ranges. That is a robots and firewall check, not a content tactic.

Pro Tip

Record the pages visibly cited for the exact prompt you tested. Use those pages as an audit trail, not as a permanent map of the engine's ranking system.

Sources that matter for local businesses

Google Business Profile supplies business information to Google's local systems, and Google's own guidelines warn that duplicate profiles cause display problems on Maps and Search. Whether ChatGPT reads that record directly is unestablished. In May 2025, Search Engine Land's Damian Rollison described ChatGPT running a Bing search for the local query, taking 20 to 30 of the top results, and reordering them with its own logic, while not reading Bing Places profile data directly. Local Falcon's November 2025 teardown observed the same shape and named the platforms it saw most: Yelp, TripAdvisor, Better Business Bureau, MapQuest, and Yellow Pages. Both are dated observations of a system that changes, and OpenAI's current documentation names no provider except in the restaurant-reservation case, where availability may come from OpenTable, Resy, or Yelp.

The Cheers baseline gives the same picture from the citation side. The most cited platform domains across all 100 metros, all four engines, were google.com, expertise.com, angi.com, bbb.org, and reddit.com. Every one of those has a record about your business that you can read today.

Review platforms like Yelp, Facebook, TripAdvisor, and industry-specific sites can appear in search results and citations. They provide customer-authored context, but the products do not publish a universal sentiment or review-ranking formula.

Your website can be retrieved when it is crawlable and relevant to the query. Clear service descriptions and accurate schema help machines interpret the page, but they do not guarantee a citation or recommendation.

Directory listings can supply business facts and appear in retrieved results. Keep relevant listings accurate, especially phone numbers, addresses, hours, URLs, and services.

News and press coverage may appear when it is relevant to the query. Earned coverage should be factual and useful, not created to simulate authority.

For a local operator, conflicting public facts create a customer problem and a source-audit target. If Bing-visible pages, Yelp, BBB, Apple Maps, and the company website disagree on service area or phone number, correct the sources customers and crawlers can reach. Do not claim that consistency alone causes a recommendation.

For the plumbing-specific version of this source map, read How Do Plumbing Companies Get Recommended by ChatGPT?.

Next step

Is AI recommending your business?

Find out how visible you are across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and AI Overviews.

What this means for your strategy

You can't control which sources a particular AI query uses. But you can ensure your business is well-represented across all the major sources.

Important

Maintain your Google Business Profile, then inspect the other sources that actually appear for your markets and prompts. Do not create or maintain a listing only because it appears in a generic platform checklist.

Earn reviews where customers use the platform. Keep relevant profiles accurate and follow each platform's solicitation policy. Do not manufacture a multi-platform review footprint for an assumed AI benefit.

Implement applicable schema markup. It should describe the visible page accurately and should not be treated as a recommendation guarantee.

Maintain business-information accuracy. Correct wrong or stale names, addresses, phone numbers, hours, URLs, and services. Harmless formatting differences are not the same as conflicting facts.

Keep information current. Update profiles and pages when hours, services, locations, contact paths, or policies change. Old data is not always worse than no data, but incorrect data can harm the customer journey.

Build a source stack. Your website should explain services and locations clearly. Your listings should match the same facts. Your reviews should show recent customer experience. Your schema should mark up the business in a machine-readable way. If you need the technical piece, see What Is JSON-LD?. If you need the review piece, see How Reviews Support AI Visibility for Local Businesses.

Important

You cannot control which source a query retrieves. You can keep the public sources you own or manage accurate, useful, and consistent with the real business.

Sources

Every link below was opened and checked on September 2, 2026.

Dylan Allen-Arnegård is the CEO of Cheers, the local search platform for service businesses.

Written by

Dylan Allen-Arnegard, CEO and Co-Founder of Cheers

Dylan Allen-Arnegård

CEO & Co-Founder, Cheers

Dylan co-founded Cheers after building reputation software for frontline teams. He leads the work that makes multi-location service brands visible to AI.

Share this article

Pass it to the operator who still thinks AI visibility is just SEO with a different label.

Share:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mostly two places. In the Cheers market baseline for the 28 days ending September 2, 2026, 48.8% of ChatGPT's home-services citations pointed at a contractor's own website and 44.7% pointed at a directory or review platform, with social, media, and google.com sharing the remaining 6.5%. OpenAI does not publish a retrieval map, and the mix varies by prompt, market, and date.

Public evidence does not establish that it does. Search Engine Land's May 2025 test observed a Bing search behind ChatGPT's local answers and no direct read of Bing Places profile data, and the Cheers baseline finds google.com in only 0.2% of ChatGPT's home-services citations against 11.4% of Google AI Overviews citations. Keep the profile accurate for Google's own surfaces; do not assume ChatGPT is reading it.

It is the single largest source ChatGPT cites for home services, at 48.8% of citations in the Cheers baseline. OpenAI's stated eligibility step is allowing OAI-SearchBot to crawl the site and not blocking its published IP ranges. Clear service and location pages give the crawler and the customer usable facts, but neither schema nor a fresh publish date guarantees a recommendation.

AI products may combine model training with search or retrieval at query time. The mix varies by product, mode, and prompt. No public source establishes that real-time review retrieval matters most for every local recommendation.

Keep reading